Mankind Cannot Create Utopia

Utopia.  Paradise.  Heaven.  Many have tried their hand at creating these places.  Based on the title of this post, you can assume that many have failed.  Make no mistake, the idea of a place free of pollution, hunger, racism, and sickness is a place we all wish we could be.  However, the notion that any leader, nation, or group of nations can be such a place is based completely in BS.

Attempts to create such a place have only resulted in more of the problems that the leaders set out to solve.  Hunger, discrimination, sickness, and other things all go through the roof.  You'll remember in a previous post that this writer mentioned the former Cambodian dictator, Pol Pot.  His goal was the create an agrarian utopia.  To accomplish this, he waged war on intelligent people, possibly for the sake of equity (that thing Kamala Harris keeps talking about).  The end result was needless death and a suffering populace.

This writer often mentions North Korea and how oppressive their regime is.  This began as Kim Il-Sung's mission to create a Communist paradise.  The result should be obvious.  What they have is a country where the people don't have enough to eat, don't question their leaders (because they literally think they are God), or can even leave the country without risking death.  Some paradise, huh?  When has paradise ever been described as a place where the people have to be scared of their leader, starve to death, and suffer in silence?

The reason why attempts to create utopia always fail is simple; humans are imperfect creatures.  We all have flaws that we can never completely overcome.  We all aren't going to agree 100% of the time.  And when push comes to shove, humans will always (and rightfully) think of themselves and their families first before even considering the needs of other people.  Think about it.  If your child is starving and a bum under an overpass is starving, which one are you going to feed first?  Anyone who says they would feed the bum before their own child is lying.  There's a difference between being unselfish and willing allowing your family to die so that someone else can eat.

The problem with trying to create a utopia is it requires the individual or group doing it to be benevolent, unselfish, and totally incorruptible.  A perfect being, so to speak.  No human alive fits the bill.  The only being in the universe who qualifies is the being we know as God.  That is why any attempt for humans to create utopia will always fail.  A perfect human or group of humans simply doesn't, cannot, and will not ever exist.

Besides a flawless leader, utopia also requires a happy populace.  As we've seen in every country who strive for this impossible goal, the people are not happy.  The people are miserable, and the leaders don't care.  Once again, going back to North Korea, a country where the government "forces" people to say they are happy, deep down inside they know they are miserable.  Just ask Yeonmi Park.

There is one place that, while far from perfect, is the closest thing we have to a utopia.  That place is the United States of America.  If you think about the totality of your experience, there is no place like it.  You can say what you want, eat what you want, worship how you want, work where you want, live where you want, drive the car you want, and all this other stuff that people all in the rest of the world can't do.  You won't go to jail or be executed if you criticize the president.  You don't have to wait on the government to move for business to get taken care of.  There is (at least for now) plentiful food, clean water, and virtually unlimited energy resources.  Our homeless population eats better than the middle class in some countries.  Some countries are better in a few areas, but once again, in terms of the total experience, you aren't going to get a better deal.

So, how did America do it?  Simple.  They used God as the foundation.  The founding fathers were flawed men, but the country was founded on godly principles stated in the Constitution.  The right to question the things you're told and not just go along with the narrative (1st Amendment) is a godly principle because God didn't create us to be stupid.  The right to defend yourself (2nd Amendment) is a godly principle because God didn't create us to be victims.  Freedom (13th Amendment) is a godly principle, because God did not create us to be slaves to men or the government.  God gave us autonomy and sense, something that the majority of countries (which do not have God at their center of their founding) don't believe in.  We are recognized as individuals, our rights are given to us by God, and we don't recognize mankind or the government as God.

To sum things up, there is no such thing as a perfect nation.  This is because nations are created by imperfect creatures.  The only thing men trying to make a utopia can create is Hell.  God is the only perfect being, and as such, is the only being capable of creating utopia.  This is a reality that even America can't escape.  Utopia can simply never exist of this side of the spiritual plane.  Hopefully, our leaders in D.C. realize this and stop trying to chase out God before they turn America from the closest thing to a utopia into Hell on Earth.

Until next time...

The Case For The 2nd Amendment

The good ol' 2nd Amendment.  The right to bear arm.  Essentially, it is the right to defend yourself and, for whatever reason, Joe Biden doesn't want that.  Why not?  What is it about Americans having the ability to defend themselves that he and many in Congress just cannot stand?

Think about it.  We can send all these weapons to Ukraine, where citizens are being trained to use them so they can defend themselves from Russia.  We can send submarines to Australia, so they can defend themselves against China.  Taiwan is now arming its citizens so they can also defend themselves against China in the near future.  Notice a theme.  Nations are arming up because all these wars could potentially break out in the near future.  So, knowing that a war could be imminent, why exactly is El Presidente so hellbent on trying to disarm his own citizens?  No matter what answer you come up with, it should disturb you.

The reason why the American mainland has yet to be invaded is because of the 2nd Amendment.  The Japanese said so themselves during World War 2.  They said they couldn't invade the American mainland because there were guns everywhere.  They knew that if they dared set foot in America, all those hunters, militiamen, and maybe even a lot of gangsters would all come together with the military and whup their asses.

When the enemy comes, they are coming to kill as many people as they see.  It won't matter how many times you voted Democrat or Republican.  It won't matter how many Pride flags you fly.  It won't matter if you're a transwoman or nonbinary.  It won't matter how many babies you abort.  It won't matter how many little boys penises you cut off.  It won't matter how inclusive your workplaces and businesses are.  It won't matter how many Drag shows you go to.  It won't matter how much you donated to BLM.  It would matter how many wind turbines and solar panels you have.  It won't matter how much you yell, "Hands up, don't shoot!"  The enemy doesn't care about ANY of that crap.  The only thing that's going to matter is whether or not you can shoot back when shot at.  And if you can't, that's your ass.

The 2nd Amendment is not just there to allow the citizens to protect the mainland.  It's also there to allow the average man or woman to protect their home.  Just ask Australia.  When the Australian government took their citizen's guns, home invasions went through the roof.  Elderly Australians had no chance to fight off invaders.  This speaks to another point this writer has brought up several time in the past; guns are the ultimate equalizer.  It doesn't matter how much bigger or younger the invader is.  If you have a gun and know how to use it, those advantages don't exist.  No, guns aren't perfect, but they give you the best chance at overcoming whoever or whatever is threatening your life.

With crime running out of control, those home invasions are only going to increase.  It's already bad enough we have bullshit judges in these bullshit cities giving bullshit sentences to criminals who stay stuck on bullshit.  If you know anything about the southern border, several terrorists have simply danced across the border and been let loose in the country.  If you think they aren't going to use this opportunity to spread death and destruction, think again.  They are terrorists.  They hate America and the freedom that comes with living here.  They hate that people can roam free, largely without fear.  They are going to do everything in their power to make you scared to leave your home.  Without an armed populace, who exactly takes that power from them?  Just look at the Middle East.

And hopefully you don't just say, "the government will kill the terrorists.  No worries."  That is piss poor logic, because the federal government is the one letting them in.  Do you really think Joe Biden is going to kill off what could be his new voter base?  No, he won't.  This why we need the 2nd Amendment.  Biden WILL drop the ball on this issue and it's going to be up to us, the American people, to pick it up and run with it.  This goes beyond Biden, as well.  One thing we should have learned from the Uvalde school shooting is that you can't rely on the government for protection because the government dropped the ball at every level.  The city, county, state, and federal government all let them down.  As a result of such a thorough failure, 19 children and 2 teachers are no longer on this side of the spiritual plane.  There are loses that could have minimized or even prevented.  A few of those teachers should have been armed.  The armed security guard should have been there.  The cops should have stopped him from entering the building in the first place.  Any of those scenarios could have, and likely would have, made all the difference.

So, if we put it all together, Joe Biden wants the make the country MORE dangerous while taking your guns, making it harder if not impossible, for the average person to defend his or herself and somehow the country will magically get safer?  And his solution to school shootings is to make the schools MORE vulnerable.  That is retard logic.  His solutions will only exacerbate the problem and increase victimhood.  The criminals will still have guns and the government will (as they've already shown) drag its feet in sending aid, all in the hope that you're already dead by the time they arrive.  As stated in another post, anything that increases victimhood is something this writer can NEVER support.  Arm up, folks.  It's your right and pretty soon it may be your duty.

Until next time...