No, this writer isn't saying that it's okay to kill dogs. This writer isn't saying the Governor Noem is or isn't a crazy bitch, because she very well might be one. This writer is even saying that Governor Noem is or isn't a good VP candidate, because this writer knows nothing about what's going on in South Dakota. But this writer does know what double standards and twisted priorities look like. This is an example of both.
Let's think about what's being said. A current sitting governor and VP candidate kills a dog and is a bad person. But a political party who's message is currently built on killing unborn human babies well...that's perfectly fine. If that's not twisted priorities and double standards, then what is? But of course that's not enough, so let's dig a little deeper at what's being said.
On its surface, it's frightening, because what's being said is that dogs are more valuable than humans. What else could it mean? We can save all these species of animals. Save the whales. Save the dogs. Save the bees. Yet, we can openly and proudly say, "kill the babies," and nobody stops to ask, "What the heck are we saying?"
Some will say it's a case of the strong preying on the innocent, but that's a load of crap. Depending on whether or not you believe Governor Noem, the dog was vicious and needed to be put down. It was attacking kids, killing chickens, and threatening her. That very well could be BS, but that's her account and nobody has come out to dispute it. On the surface, it sounds like a case of a capable person defending the weak from an immediate threat, not preying on a defenseless animal. If this is the case, then the governor is 100% in the right in what she did. This writer isn't saying that there aren't other ways the governor could have handled the situation, just that she was not in the wrong if what she said was true.
As for unborn babies being aborted, that is the ultimate case of the strong preying on the weak, because the baby has done nothing and can do nothing. Think about it. What has that baby done? What can that baby do? There is nothing more innocent than a baby in the womb...but we have to kill them for arbitrary reasons. What?
This whole situation shows that we as a country have strayed too far from God's design. It's not natural to sit back and let kids be attacked by animals because at that point you have no soul. It's not natural to let animals destroy of people's property because you could be held liable for any damage that animal does. And most of all, it's not natural to kill your kids because you want to keep your "sexy body", while you try to shame men for looking at your "sexy body". This crap comes from the Devil.
None of this is to endorse Governor Noem, because there could be valid reasons she shouldn't be Trump's VP. No, this to say we need to judge her fairly. She killed ONE dog for whatever reason and therefore no one should consider voting for her. Fair enough. So then when an ENTIRE political party is saying we need to be able to kill an uncountable number of babies right up until the moment of birth or even after birth, why should we consider voting for them? Those who prey on the weak should not be rewarded, right?
Until next time...
No comments:
Post a Comment