Friday, November 4, 2016

False Rape

Rape.  One of the most evil things a human being can do.  For a human being (not just women, because men get raped, too) to force themselves sexually is just villianous.  Make no mistake, rape is vile and people who do such an act deserve to burn in the deepest recesses of Hell, no matter how hard they pray for forgiveness.

What about those who claim they were raped, but it turns out to be a lie.  Yep, that's right.  Not everyone who get accused of it actually does it.  This writer has seen multiple stories where people tell straight up lies.  Bill Cosby (who this writer could still be wrong on), Brian Banks, Nate Parker (by the way, you'll find a trend if you search these names), and others have all been lied on by vindictive women.  While women aren't the only ones who do this, they are the primary perps.

Why do they do this?  Any number of reasons.  Maybe the sex was bad.  Maybe she thought the sex would lead to a relationship that the other party didn't agree to (which is a different kind of rape).  Perhaps the person is hurting and just wants someone else to hurt (which seems to be the case with Nate Parker).  This writer's personal favorite is when the 'victim' just wants attention (which is what happened to Brian Banks).  The 'victim' can literally cry rape because the sky is blue and be believed with no facts (and sometimes the person they accuse isn't even real).

What worse is that the government and public at large aid these 'victims' in their false narratives.  The government makes BS laws that encourage 'victims' (women in particular) to lie without penalty.  That's right.  These people get to go to court and lie (which is a crime itself) and get away with it.  How is this fair?  What part of this makes sense?  How are these 'victims' not rotting is jail for lying to a judge.

Even worse is that the general public will try to make you feel ashamed for not automatically believing these 'victims'.  This writer remembers when he stood out and didn't say Mr. Cosby was a rapist.  All this writer said was he wanted to hear all the fact before he took the women's side.  People proceed to say that people like this writer make it harder for victims (real victims) to come out.  Just so just understand, these people are saying we should crucify a person based solely on heresay.  No proof, no witnesses, no footage, just heresay.  Garbage.  To this day, they still haven't proven that Mr. Cosby had anything but consensual sex with these 'victims'.  So you're expected to hate a man who innocence is only being proven by each person that comes out against him.  How does that work?

This writer personally knows someone who was accused of rape.  Naturally, his 'victims' were caught lying because he had solid proof he didn't do what they said he did.  What happened to them?  Diddly squat, that's what.  Meanwhile, this writer's friend's life is ruined over a lie.  He degree, his job experience, and his good reputation meant nothing, even after he was proven innocent.

That's another thing.  The accused can never move on, even after proven innocent.  He (or she) will always be a rapist in the eye of the public despite not really being a rapist.  Let this writer say it again.  Your life can be ruined over a lie and you should never be allowed to recover.  You're supposed to wallow in the shame of a crime you didn't commit and die broken and poor.  That is bull stuff with a capital 'B'.  This should be scary, particularly if you're a straight male of any race.

This post is getting long, so this writer will end it.  False rape is just is bad as real rape, because in the end, lives will be ruined.  Reputations and livelihoods will be destroyed and jail time will be served for lies.  Actually, false rape is worse than real rape, because unlike real rape, the real criminals are never brought to justice.  And the government, courts, and public think this is okay.

Until next time...

2 comments:

  1. I wholeheartedly agree with what you are saying. The only thing I might add is it Bill Cosby gave those women drugs and then they appeared to consent, it might not have been consent in the real meaning of the word.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. According to what this writer has heard, the women consented to the drugs before he used them. They probably wanted to unwind and took those drugs. Of course, as stated in the post, this writer could be wrong.

      Delete